Hacker News

2472 readers

368 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se

rssbot@lemmy.bestiver.se

Can modern LLMs count the number of b's in "blueberry"? (minimaxir.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by rssbot@lemmy.bestiver.se to c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Each time I ask any LLM what the complementary color to red is. Then I always get green as answer instead of cyan (With cyan being the only correct answer). And a completely wrong explanation about what complementary colors are based on digital screens.

🤦 Oh... oh wow, I was giving you way more credit than what you actually meant. You do realize there is more than one color model? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementary_colors#In_different_color_models You probably should read the explanation about complementary colors based on digital screens that they are providing to you (or just pay attention in elementary art class), because you might actually learn something new.

Red Yellow Blue and Cyan Yellow Magenta are both subtractive color models. RGB is an additive color model.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RYB_color_model

Try giving the LLM the hex color code and the color model you're using that code in, and it will give you the correct complementary color.

[+] zeropointone@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

There is no one "correct" color circle. And your misguided beliefs about color theory do not have anything to do with LLMs.

By the way, they're called "additive colors", not "active colors". 🙃

[+] zeropointone@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

😂 alright well, you've been corrected and proven wrong, with sources and screenshots. And clearly you're getting a teeny bit upset over it. Sorry! There's nothing wrong with learning something new, and its okay that you had made a mistake.

[–] picnicolas@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This was a fun rabbit hole to go down! I tend to agree with most of the takes here on Lemmy but the complete AI derision is pretty wild and unfounded in reality. I have plenty of concerns about the tech but to say it’s useless you’d have to really not even have tried it out to see for yourself. I appreciate your patience, dedication to the truth, willingness to explain, and experimental attitude here.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

This was a super bizarre case of "the neutral networks that are a predictive model of all of the world's knowledge don't share my belief that only one specific color model is valid, therefore they suck" 😂