this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
424 points (79.4% liked)

Technology

74003 readers
3236 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 378 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Just stick with Firefox and uBlock Origin.

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

dont give them solutions, they want to be angry

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Honest question, but what makes librewolf BETTER? In firefox you can easily toggle off the studies telemetry bullshit in the settings. Librewolf is just firefox with those things ripped out right?

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I feel like I’m often getting new devices or reinstalling my OSes. I restart from scratch a lot. Going through the steps to harden Firefox becomes tedious. Librewolf starts from where I want to be.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In firefox you can easily toggle off the studies telemetry bullshit in the settings.

They're abusing the default and making privacy settings require user intervention rather than defaulting to the most private settings and allowing the option of opting in.

It's abusing consent, so people move to browsers where privacy is the default option.

[–] FalseTautology@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago

Blocking abp was the last straw for me, thank you for suggesting librewolf

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

This is what makes Librewolf better.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes. I consider it better because it's preconfigured for privacy, includes UBlock Origin by default, and rips Mozilla's telemetry out. So you never have to worry about them sneaking something new in a later update.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm more worried about the updates not happening in a timely fashion. Is it just a passion project by a handful of devs, or is there some kind of funding?

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Update frequency/latency hasn't been an issue in the 2 years I've been using it.

https://librewolf.net/#what-is-librewolf

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Sure, but what about in 2 years from now?

I used IronFox for a couple years and it suddenly stopped getting updates, and it took me a few months to realize and switch to something else. I don't want that to happen again.

I like the idea of librewolf, especially that it's just a patch set on top of Firefox, but someone needs to maintain that patch set. This would be fine for simpler software, but browsers are complex and I just worry that updates will stall out with little warning.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Certainly a valid concern, but it's true with any software. I think enough people (techies especially) are using LibreWolf that a lack of updates would be visible quickly.

Perhaps. But a browser is something I'd prefer to just forget about and not track updates. So it's very likely that I won't check if it has gotten updates for a few months.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Two years is enough time for Firefox itself to cease to exist. Cross that bridge when you burn it

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe? It's a lot less likely for FF to disappear than LibreWolf.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed. But it's still too far of a timeframe to be worried about imo

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, perhaps I'll try it out. I've made most of the changes they did in my config though.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you use Firefox sync already?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup. Switching won't be a big deal.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Librewolf has sync disabled, but if you enable that it's as easy as signing in. If it goes to shit like you're worried about, you still have it syncing

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not worried about data loss. Honestly, the only feature I actually care about from sync is open tabs and recent history, since I'll often open something on one device that I was using on another. I don't really use bookmarks or saved passwords.

My main concern is security. I don't want my machines to be susceptible to malware, and with browsers being very complex, I want to make sure the dev team is very responsive in shipping security updates.

The main reason I use IronFox on my phone is that it works with FDroid, which is important because I don't have Google Play running on my main profile (I use GapheneOS). If the flatpak is updated within a few days of Firefox consistently, that's good enough. But if it takes weeks or more, that's too much.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

They've been on point so far as far as I know

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

as I understand their build system is automatic. updates are not, but they have an update checker companion thing, and flathub too can manage that if you install from there

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m not a contributor to LibreWolf so I can’t speak with authority on it but I can’t imagine that they are so different from Firefox that they wouldn’t be able to just merge 99% of updates from FF with minimal effort.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

From looking at the repo, it looks like it's simply a set of patches that get applied to the Firefox source code. They don't maintain a fork, just a set of changes that get applied before building.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

There's benefits to us not tweaking privacy settings. TOR explicitly discourages it. You don't (always) get fingerprinted by a single unique item, it's through an ensemble of data points that companies can identify who you are. There may be 10% of users with your same font library, and 1% who has the same monitor width, and 5% with the same time zone, and voila, when you multiply those percentages, you get close to one in a couple billion, and they've successfully fingerprinted you.

If everyone tweaks their settings from default Firefox, you reveal more information about yourself each time. You may think you're protecting yourself, but the reality is the opposite, you're creating a one of a kind browser config. This is where Librewolf can really reign supreme, if we all just use stock Librewolf, no one will be unique, and everyone will be anonymous.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Librewolf doesn’t just block Mozilla telemetry, it also has an easy to understand default for cookies and privacy settings so someone who isn’t a computer expert can rely on the librewolf’s defaults to keep trackers from being able to build a profile on you.

[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sadly i have to stop using it. Librewolf has start getting some graphic bug, i also can't upload pictures to some website (it show just lines). Now i'm trying Floorp.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is caused by not allowing the website to access your html canvas data. You can fix this in the address bar by clicking the icon on the left of the URL to grant permissions.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

To add to this.

This isn't a bug, it's a feature.

Canvas data gives a lot of datapoints that websites can use to fingerprint your browser. This allows them to track you across multiple sites even if you're blocking ads and pi-holing tracking services.

There is an unavoidable tradeoff between convenience and security/privacy. Privacy features are inherently less convenient than allowing everyone access to everything.

You could disable canvas blocking globally (I'm assuming, I haven't looked) and the problem would go away, but you've then weakened the privacy protections that were built in to the browser.

[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

As much as I like Librewolf as concept and ideology, I can't keep thinking that if there's a Firefox 0day, Firefox gets patched first, Librewolf later, and I'm potentially exposed for longer. That's why I prefer to stick with upstream.

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Have you noticed uBlock Origin being a bit hit and miss on YouTube lately? I’ve had it happen a few times lately where the video won’t play, or an ad comes up but doesn’t play. I’ve had to keep refreshing until it gets to normal where it just plays the damn video.

[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No. It works across all my systems. I never see ads on YT. However...

Videos not loading or playing delayed: That's a YT feature which they implemented for Firefox users, to annoy them. And to promote Chrome as "the fastest" webbrowser.

I also have dns issues at home... I should fix them already. Sometimes, a page doesn't load on the first try.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 20 points 2 days ago

You can try user agent switcher. Sometimes it is detected or causes issues, but if YouTube thinks you are running Chrome then you may get better service.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I experience the same issue. All the elements on the page load extremely slow or sometimes not at all.

[–] CyberSeeker@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I noted an experimental rule in uBO to address delays, but have not tried it yet myself.

Under settings, Filter lists, Built-in, uBlock filters - Experimental

Code has a comment:

! fake buffering on the initial load

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think youtube might have implemented something that prevents the server from delivering the video files until the expected duration of the ad has passed. This idea is completely unfounded, but this is what it feels like to me.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Maybe it is a regional thing? I was watching YouTube 30 mins ago with no issues and haven't ever had any unless I open a new tab but don't try to watch until the next day. Then I just need to refresh and it is off to the races.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago

a b testing

or he needs to update his unlock

[–] elvith@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Work PC and I have to use edge there with Ghostery (ugh). Was trying to find a decent coding tutorial. Every page load of a video was a playback error that instantly vanished when I hit reload. No problems on FF with uBO today, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I sometimes get a popup warning from YouTube that my account will be blocked from viewing videos if I keep running an ad blocker. But the warning goes away after a while and YouTube still works. I don't see ads except on mobile.

Oddly, they also keep begging me to "return" to YouTube Premium, though I have never paid for YouTube Premium.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Oddly, they also keep begging me to “return” to YouTube Premium, though I have never paid for YouTube Premium.

This is just 'normal' commercial psychological manipulation.

Returning sounds better than starting, so a small percentage of people would sign up that wouldn't have otherwise if it was worded accurately.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If on mobile, try setting it to desktop mode. Also, getting the chameleon extension and pretending you are using chrome can also help.

[–] kwarg@mander.xyz 1 points 12 hours ago

I am not an expert so don't quote me here, but I think there are ways of bypassing the agent switcher/spoofer (like chameleon) revealing the true browser you are using... that would actually make you MORE fingerprintable.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

I haven't had any issues like that, it's been working fine for me

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

I use different shared PCs at work and this happens every time on the Windows 11 machines. Some ad plays before the video, but disappears when I refresh the page. This doesn't happen on the Win 10 machines we still have left. In forced to use Chrome there but everything has UBlock Lite enabled.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

The article even links to a guide to get it on chrome

That said though, there is one ad blocker that still works. Two words: uBlock Origin. Yes, I know that Google has blocked it from its Chrome Extension store, but there is still a way to get uBlock Origin on Chrome that our how-to extraordinaire Kaycee has detailed.