this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
1092 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

74945 readers
3699 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
1092
GitHub is no longer independent at Microsoft after CEO resignation (www.theverge.com)
submitted 4 weeks ago by zaphod@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
177 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sad_detective_man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

shit, whats this going to mean for repos like massgrave? will microsoft enforce shitty policies against DIY software that's published there if it violates somebody's terms of use?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 59 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm finding this kind of Pikachu surprised face meme worthy, really.

We all know and knew that GitHub is Microsoft's. We all know that Microsoft is fucking evil, yet everyone and their mother have their main repo management with GitHub.

W.T.F.

what did you expect would happen, sooner rather than later?

Well technically nothing has happened yet, but you can imagine the fun that is coming

[–] iglou@programming.dev 18 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

I honestly don't understand why Github hasn't been abandoned by users at this point. If I were a company, I'd either go to the competition, who is just as good if not better, or host in-house if the means are there.

I'm just a freelancer and I gave up on github 3 years ago

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What are you using?

[–] iglou@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I use my own gitea server. If I was willing to pay for a more solid service I'd probably go for GitLab.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Go with self hosted solutions, it's really not that hard.

[–] iglou@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

For a small to medium company it's not necessarily worth it.

[–] turdburglar@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 weeks ago

i’m having these same feelings about my youtube channel. they tell me i’m paranoid…

‘what, you think youtube is gonna go down?’

it’s not that i think it’s gonna go down, but it’s that nothing gold can stay. i gotta get some eggs in a different basket.

[–] sad_detective_man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 weeks ago

woah. I really didn't know. I guess in that case it's also strange it didn't happen sooner

[–] finix_the_psyker@sopuli.xyz 27 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Just move to codeberg or a similar site.

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

https://git.disroot.org/explore/repos

Codeberg doesn't allow inactive projects or non FOSS projects afaik

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Codeberg doesn’t allow inactive projects or non FOSS projects afaik

if you're hosting the code on codeberg, aint it foss?

[–] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

Source-available isn't the same as free and open-source. You might not be able to distribute or modify as you like to the former and may have any sort of license provisioned with further restrictions.