this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
406 points (99.3% liked)

politics

25168 readers
2463 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 7 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

The law does matter. People don't seem to realize just how much of Trump's bullshit has already been stopped by the courts.

The majority of his executive orders have all been blocked or straight-up nullified, so far...but thanks to the overwhelming volume of court cases and the long delays in reaching some decisions...the media never covers the outcomes to the same extent.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Exactly, he is escalating bc he is feeling pressure. He is getting worried about the midterms. That is not to say that the law will surely prevail in the end, but just to point out that he wouldn't even be bothering to test the waters with threats of "maybe your city is next" if he didn't believe he would see pushback.

He's already sent and recalled much of the military in L.A., so what tf is he even talking about? Floating the idea of sending them again only to then recall them again?

D.C. has gained autonomy as a city, but keep in mind it was already unique compared to Chicago, LA, and NY bc it's already a federal district. When he called for a "federal takeover" a few days ago, he meant stripping the city of its autonomy in terms of taking the power from the mayor.

When he tried to take LA the first time, he experienced pushback from both city and state governments. Military morale was reportedly extremely low, he made them sleep on the floor bc he didn't really have any kind of a plan other than a show of force. In the end, he basically succeeded in a public show of wasting money and resources for absolutely nothing.

Now what? He's going to send in the troops again? Surely they'll get the job done the second time around.

[–] tane69@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Buddy if the law mattered even one fucking iota trump himself would be buried under the prison.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

If the law was perfect or if the law even worked as intended, he would have been in prison a long time ago.

If the law didn't matter at all, he wouldn't bother making threats and testing the waters. The military never would have been recalled from LA the first time around. The FBI would have already arrested the TX Democrats in Chicago, and TX Republicans would have just gone ahead with the redistricting without a second thought (which even I'm pretty surprised that they didn't).

Will the law alone prevail and save us in the end? Not likely, but there is a difference between being naive and not allowing yourself to panic and be backed into a corner of black and white thinking. In many ways, doing so is accepting defeat.

Being smart and strategizing means using the law and along with everything else to your advantage while you still can. Trump has been bulldozing through law bc his goal is to betray his own country. Democrats in TX are breaking the law, but they're doing it strategically to save their country. They're aligning themselves with Democrats in other states, and uniting as Americans. That's what we all should be doing.

[–] tane69@lemmy.world -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You are a useful idiot for this admin.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

No you're right, I'm the useful idiot for not buying what's being sold to me by a reality TV star. Now is definitely not the time for alliances against a traitorous coup.

Might as well give up and accept it's over. No point in fighting to hold on to what's left. Every man for himself. It's total anarchy.

"Put them through trauma." Either it took you less than 8 months to break, or you're fully aware of your usefulness.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca -2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

That's not how the law works.

[–] tane69@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh okay please explain how the law works I’m sure youre a lawyer or a judge or some other type of legal expert. We’re all dying to hear how our president isn’t guilty of literally dozens and possibly hundreds of serious financial and sexual crimes dating back to the 1980s, or how he is guilty and the fact that he hasn’t been punished is just “how the law works”

Man I hate lemmoids

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You still need to present evidence, in court, before you can throw someone in (or under) prison. Or do you think Trump is right by arguing that he shouldn't have to follow due process against HIS targets? The law should be equally applied to everyone...so, if you think it's ok to simply ignore the process for him, then anyone can simply ignore the process for others.

Guilt by decree is not "justice".

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

If anyone else was a 34 time convicted felon they would be spending life without parole in jail.

But do go on about how the law is definitely working, and does affect the rich.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 0 points 14 hours ago

I'm not saying the system is perfect. There's no such thing as a perfect system. But throwing away the entire concept of due process, just because rich people have the advantage of hiring better lawyers, is not the answer.

There are definitely ways to reform the system to make it more equitable...but skipping the parts where evidence is required for a conviction, or closing all possibilities for appeals? No. All that does is give people like Trump the perfect weapon to use against their enemies. None of us are safe, if we abandon those foundational principles.

[–] Tehbaz@lemmy.wtf 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

He would be dead shortly after being locked up because he wouldn't survive withdrawal from his fast food and orange makeup addiction.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago

Also amphetamines

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 12 points 20 hours ago

whenever an EO gets challenged or struck down, Trump figures out a way to get rid of the problem or go around it. the only thing the law is doing is showing him vulnerabilities to exploit. state injunctions are legally being ignored thanks to SCOTUS, so.. Trump does not have to listen to judges.