People Twitter

8181 readers

992 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

804

[UPDATE: fake] They made his car "cease & desist" (lemmus.org)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by sundray@lemmus.org to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

202 comments fedilink hide all child comments

UPDATE: Busted by the Verge, sorry everybody. Fuck.

*Original Post*

Link to the Threads post.

Article: Tesla Allegedly Disables Rapper’s Cybertruck After Song Critique.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Things that are surprising me right now (not in order):

Big Huey is such a non-entity. There are 3 tracks of his (& one collab) on the whole damn internet that I can see. Why did Tesla even bother?
The video is flattering to the deactivated item. They can afford to lose admirers right now? Why do they feel so safe?
There are no written records of the lyrics on the internet I could find.
Why does his label's website have an offer to "buy a verse"? Dude so unfamous and lacking success he's trying to sell clout to strangers.
Yet he owns a cybertruck and has only needed to make a handful of videos over the last 4 years.
The news wants us to think Tesla is retaliating over a dissenting view, erroneously (?!)

The whole thing reads like a maze of mirrors. At no point does the story make actual sense. Did we really see a jumped-up vanity project get stomped by a mega corp for no actual reason?

What explanation could make this series of events make sense? Is Huey a Tesla plant? Is this a (botched? Who knows) test balloon by the company trying to create a legal precedent for corporate powers to smash all dissent? Then why would they pick a target that was favourable to them? They must not want to prejudice the jury...

I can't make the pieces all fit. But I feel that it must make complete sense to one of the players.