this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
1154 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

73876 readers
3391 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 99 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The pathological need to find something to use LLMs for is so bizzare.

Venture capital dumped so much money into the tech without understanding the full scope of what it was capable of. Now they're so in so deep that they desperately NEED to find something profitable it can do, otherwise they'll lose the farm.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Firefox has little financial motivation for this, though?

Other than getting "AI" investor money, if that's the plan... But otherwise it just feels like they're following a meme.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It makes a lot more sense when you realize that the Mozilla corporation is a for profit run by the same techno-fascist aggrandizing bait-and-switch narcissists as the rest of SV.

I've been saying it for years, but I will never donate to Firefox until it is freed from the shackles of a for profit corporation that can use your donation for any profit motive it sees fit; not even related to Firefox.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 11 points 1 day ago

IIRC, you can't even donate to Firefox. You can only donate to Mozilla. It seems pretty clear to me why they set it up that way....

[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't the "for-profit" Mozilla Corporation owned by the "non-profit" Mozilla Foundation though?

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I don't care. It's a corrosive force that causes them to pay for over priced CEO's and integrate services that nobody cares about into Firefox (like pocket) or that runs against their principles (container VPN's exclusive to Mozillas for-profit VPN).

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

90% of their cash flow comes from google to be the default search engine - they are probably trying to open up alternative routes of funding to reduce the risk, since it's not guaranteed that the money will keep coming due to the current lawsuit.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right, I sympathize with that.

…But also it’s ridiculous. Like why should including a feature with “AI” in it get them VC money? Even if that’s kinda reality?

TBH they should just become a contributor to llama.cpp and market that somehow.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Like why should including a feature with “AI” in it get them VC money?

Spoken like someone who's never interacted with Silicon Valley VCs... just imagine someone with tons of a money, a moderately competent business background, and very little understanding of even the basics of technology that you and I take for granted. And then make them stupid and greedy.

"AI? Yes please! Here's some money, I've heard of Firefox so I know you're good for it." It's not really any more complicated than that, I don't think.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Well, exactly. Then why the pretense?

They could contribute to some existing local inference effort, do actually useful dev work, and slap their brand on it. It would both be cheaper and "look" better to VCs.

Basically do what ollama's doing but less shady.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 1 points 16 hours ago

Yeah. There would be a way to do it that I feel like might potentially be useful. The described method (doing clustering instead of just having a similarity threshold to group tabs together, vectorizing the entire tab title through a whole fucking network instead of just tokenizing it and calling two tabs similar if they have uncommon tokens that are within a certain similarity level) really sounds to me like people who have no real idea what they're doing, just being "ML experts" all over the codebase and fucking things up, and probably walking away very proud of themselves while helping themselves to bunches and bunches of the Mozilla Foundation's Google-money.