this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
530 points (98.7% liked)

News

37079 readers
2719 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip -2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If even half of the 49 countries with US military bases coordinated an attack on said bases, we might be able to actually start the dissolving of the American empire.

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That Sun Tzu quote “don’t interrupt your enemy when he’s making a mistake” comes to mind.

The least effort and greatest impact will come from those countries staying quiet and letting Trump keep doing what he’s doing.

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

“In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity” -Sun Tzu

I'm definitely no military strategist, so I'll concede that I don't know what it would really mean to "attack" those bases, especially when I would always rather see that action taken by the people of the countries rather than their governments without their consent. But is there no value to the assault on many fronts? If there was a coordinated endeavor from 25 different countries to weaken and/or remove US military bases from their land all at the same time, couldn't that split focus enough to actually weaken the US imperial grip?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sun Tzu and Trump are both artists I guess, but in different areas.

[–] stankcheez@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Trump's "art" mostly involves smearing the walls with shit

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Instead you could just like... cancel the leases? I see this "rise up" sentiment repeated a ton and while a romantic image, it just screams that people don't understand how foreign military bases actually work. Like, rise up to get your government to just ask the US to leave. For that too, most US military bases aren't forts or anything, you could effectively neutralize them just by blocking the beer truck from making it's deliveries. There's very little the troops stationed there can do to stop that besides call in the host country to deal with the problem (which is invariably what happens).

The real threats are the five-eyes intelligence gathering facilities - but there's no government in the world that's going to ask those to be removed, I can't imagine what would be persuading them not to...

[–] JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah I would always rather see the people rising up, and a worldwide revolution would be the most effective way to make real lasting change. But yeah that's pretty solidly a romantic fantasy at this point. That's all it keeps boiling down to. No war but class war.