this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
888 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

74345 readers
2619 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 242 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

There is something fundamentally fucked up in a country that arrests and puts in jail a 13 years old kid over a bad joke.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 122 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh I missed that bit. JFC she's 13. How can police be so clueless about their own job... rhetorical question, I know the answer.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

"clueless" thats pretty much what the leo jobs are.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

But can't put the pedo convicted felon grifter behind bars...

[–] artyom@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

The result of "no tolerance policies".

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are schools not government organisations (in most cases) and would they not be subject to the first amendment?

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The first amendment is not absolute - things like threats are not protected speech. Although I agree that in this instance there might be a case that her constitutional rights were violated, I suspect it would be dismissed as having been a justifiable action from the administration/police who "couldn't ignore a credible threat" or something equally bullshit...