this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
232 points (92.3% liked)

World News

48997 readers
2345 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would anyone use a 5.56 for home defense they seem significantly worse at clearing rooms than a handgun especially considering it is incredibly unlikely a home invader would ever have body armour on.

Also obviously this is not the best source in the world but it shows 5.56 going through 9 1/2 walls which is again atrocious for home defense

“Though the 5.56 bullets showed the most deformation, they were also terribly penetrative (19 panels, or nine walls) and, beyond the first two or three panels, created relatively large holes as they tumbled along their paths.”

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/wall-to-wall-testing-penetration-of-home-defense-ammo

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would anyone

People do, for the reasons I said, and others. I don't agree with it, but it's a thing.

shows 5.56 going through 9 1/2 walls

Because your source says:

each separated by 3.5 inches

That's not going thru 9 1/2 walls, that's tumbling like 2 feet after initial contact.

Like, that's not reflected well in your source, it's got magtech 10mm (kind of the "hot" production load) barely beating out basic bitch 9mm...

And 357 less than the 9mm?

There are very obvious flaws with whatever that guy was doing

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The only reason you listed was its lack of penetration but it seems that it does still over penetrate and the effect of the longer firearm is a major flaw for home defense.

so if you wanted an actual gun that didn’t over penetrate a handgun with frangible ammo is the much more logical weapon, is it not?

Compared to drywall the effect of air resistance is negligible so the spacing on the dry wall sheets is essentially irrelevant.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

If it hit one, or hit 100 in 6 inches....

It would still cause a small fast bullet to lose effectiveness. Because a small bullet is effective because of speed

I honestly don't know how to explain it any simpler