this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
79 points (96.5% liked)
Linux Gaming
20623 readers
329 users here now
Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME
away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.
This page can be subscribed to via RSS.
Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.
No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.
Resources
WWW:
Discord:
IRC:
Matrix:
Telegram:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As posted in another thread already...
There's nothing wrong with Secure Boot and enabling it can prevent a small subset of attack vectors with no real downsides. That being said, the things Secure Boot does protect against aren't likely to be an issue for most users but it's nothing to be afraid of.
ok but why is there is some much hate from people esp it seem foss types.
I think it primarily has to do with Microsoft requiring motherboard manufacturers to include their key, but other operating systems don't have the pull. So it could potentially be seen as a form of lockdown. Personally I also don't see the issue, especially now since it's been a soft requirement for Windows for so long that most Linux distros just handle key generation and enrollment when installing.
I just think the user should be the one to decide whether they enable it or not. Pre-built PCs and motherboards can enable it by default, but it should be simple to bypass (and it usually is) and no company should be demanding or requiring people enable it.
The same applies for TPM2, which is also useful but shouldn't be a requirement. If nothing else because of the E-waste this can cause by requiring PCs to support it. And most new PCs will end up enabling it in the long run anyway, so there is no need to force the issue.