this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
209 points (92.0% liked)

World News

48976 readers
2024 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 103 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

The Air Force specifically requested Cybertrucks due to concerns that adversaries might use them on the battlefield, citing their reported resistance to normal damage.

Lol

The contract stipulates that the Cybertrucks must be towable, non-functional, and have all fluids drained before delivery.

So...

Just average Cybertrucks?

Also, I sure as fuck hope they know to remove batteries from EVs too

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

I'm sure the military will do their usual job of being very concerned about the environment and minimizing pollution.

/s

[–] jonne 33 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Lol, because insurgents will prefer a truck that needs to be charged out in the open for hours over one that can be filled using jerrycans.

Electric vehicles are great, but I doubt the Tesla supercharger network extends to wherever the air force expects to be bombing people next.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

wherever the air force expects to be bombing people next.

California?

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Fuck.

I wonder if they're working on targeting that'll avoid those stupid things.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

How many Hiluxes do you think insurgents could buy for the price of one Cybertruck?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 9 points 18 hours ago
[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

I hardly know her!

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I watched a gun youtuber shoot one up for science. As one would expect for a consumer vehicle, any and all military calibers like 5.56 passed through it like hot butter.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

military calibers like 5.56 passed through it like hot butter

It did....

But 5.56 is dogshit at penetration. Like, a normal car does pretty well against it, but the cyber truck is just that bad against it.

It has less penetration than handgun calibers, and one of the reasons it's recommended for home defense is an interior wall that's basically just two sheets of drywall could stop it.

There's a reasons gangstas use AKs and not ARs...

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Why would anyone use a 5.56 for home defense they seem significantly worse at clearing rooms than a handgun especially considering it is incredibly unlikely a home invader would ever have body armour on.

Also obviously this is not the best source in the world but it shows 5.56 going through 9 1/2 walls which is again atrocious for home defense

“Though the 5.56 bullets showed the most deformation, they were also terribly penetrative (19 panels, or nine walls) and, beyond the first two or three panels, created relatively large holes as they tumbled along their paths.”

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/wall-to-wall-testing-penetration-of-home-defense-ammo

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Why would anyone

People do, for the reasons I said, and others. I don't agree with it, but it's a thing.

shows 5.56 going through 9 1/2 walls

Because your source says:

each separated by 3.5 inches

That's not going thru 9 1/2 walls, that's tumbling like 2 feet after initial contact.

Like, that's not reflected well in your source, it's got magtech 10mm (kind of the "hot" production load) barely beating out basic bitch 9mm...

And 357 less than the 9mm?

There are very obvious flaws with whatever that guy was doing

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

The only reason you listed was its lack of penetration but it seems that it does still over penetrate and the effect of the longer firearm is a major flaw for home defense.

so if you wanted an actual gun that didn’t over penetrate a handgun with frangible ammo is the much more logical weapon, is it not?

Compared to drywall the effect of air resistance is negligible so the spacing on the dry wall sheets is essentially irrelevant.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 12 points 16 hours ago

Then that tells me the cybertruck is even more dogshit at stopping bullets than I thought it was! 🤣

[–] Asmodeus_Krang 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Not all 5.56 bullets are the same. I've got 75 grain bonded core that'll penetrate walls just fine and M855A1 if more penetration is needed. Shit, even run of the mill M193 will defeat level 4 plates out of a 20" barrel.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve got 75 grain bonded core

If you just increase the mass by 20% shove a solid dense core in then it does better!

/s

Shit, even run of the mill M193 will defeat level 4 plates out of a 20" barrel.

Wildy, just wildly untrue...

To be certied level 3, you need to stop a m193

Like by the very definition of level IV, it can stop m193

Who is telling you this stuff and why were you believing them?

This isn't secret or even hard to obtain information

[–] Asmodeus_Krang 1 points 15 hours ago

Lol. Okay 👌

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 9 points 20 hours ago

I hope they don't.