this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
70 points (80.7% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 70 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

Seriously though, she chose a show that was randomly chosen by the algorithm, she watched it, and more content of that type was suggested to her by the algorithm.

This isn't quite rocket science.

[–] reflex@kbin.social 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

and more content of that type was suggested

That, or they might have figured it out from her search patterns alone—like how Target figured out that one woman was gregnant before she did.

[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

They didn't figure anything out. There's no sentience in the algorithm, only the creators of said algorithm. It only chose content based on input. So it all revolves around the choices of the article's author.

Same thing with the woman who was pregnant, the algorithm gave choices based on the user's browsing history. It made the connection that the choice of product A was also chosen by pregnant mothers, therefore the shopper might be interested in product B which is something an expecting mother would buy.

[–] reflex@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They didn't figure anything out.

Ugh, I was agreeing with you, and you go pedant. Come on, you should know "figure out" doesnt necessarily imply sentience. It can also be used synonymously with, "determine."

[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Sorry, I misunderstood your tone. Apologize for going all pedantic…it’s a character flaw.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)