this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
4 points (75.0% liked)
Aotearoa / New Zealand
1957 readers
25 users here now
Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general
- For politics , please use !politics@lemmy.nz
- Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, and non-NZ topics belong in !offtopic@lemmy.nz
- If you need help using Lemmy.nz, go to !support@lemmy.nz
- NZ regional and special interest communities
Rules:
FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom
Banner image by Bernard Spragg
Got an idea for next month's banner?
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The main driving force behind this seems to be hybrids, both plug in and conventional.
It's very difficult to levy a plug in hybrid fairly, because part of their driving is on electricity, part is petrol, and the amount varies widely between vehicles, meaning with a set RUC rate, they are either getting stiffed or are freeloading, and no two are the same.
The fact that non plug in hybrids are so insanely efficient probably doesn't help either.
This is one of the few good ideas our govt has had, I think.
We definitely want to discourage the purchase of fuel efficient cars that's for sure.
Agreed.
It has been needed since the prius became popular....
You can get some extreme efficiencies for vehicles now. It is quite unfair on those who cannot afford the latest in tech to be paying the highest road maintenance tax.
The latest corolla gets 3.8l/100. If you are driving an equivalent one from the early 2000's you are not going to be doing much better than 10l/100. So a person that can't afford a new car is paying ~2.5x the maintenance tax.
I don't think the gap is quite that big, unless you're driving exclusively in heavy traffic, I'd expect somewhere in the 7l/100km range for an old corolla.
In stop and go traffic, the difference could well be double in the older vehicle though.