this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
524 points (99.8% liked)

News

31486 readers
3260 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/45614563

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/5763205

One is attached to the International Space Station, and the other is collecting data as a stand-alone satellite. The latter would meet its permanent demise after burning up in the atmosphere if the mission were to be terminated.

A 2023 review by NASA concluded that the data they'd been providing had been "of exceptionally high quality."

The observatories provide detailed carbon dioxide measurements across various locations, allowing scientists to get a detailed glimpse of how human activity is affecting greenhouse gas emissions.

(Ex NASA employee) David Crisp said it "makes no economic sense to terminate NASA missions that are returning incredibly valuable data," pointing out it costs only $15 million per year to maintain both observatories, a tiny fraction of the agency's $25.4 billion budget.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Somewhat related, would be nice if they'd order Juno to be rerouted to check out interstellar comet 3I-Atlas, has to be done before the end of the month. Juno is slated to be deorbited into Jupiter in September so has no actual science left to do but probably enough fuel remaining for the rendesvous.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's a fantastic idea, really clever. But I'm afraid it's too late, it doesn't have the necessary Delta-V. We could have tried it if we had planned the mission a month ago, but at this point we just can't get there in time (We didn't know its trajectory a month ago, so it's a moot point). What it comes down to is this, to make a flyby it would need about 2.5k Delta V, Juno has about half that.

Also, we're not confident Juno's engines will light. We've previously refrained from using them for some planned manners because we recorded abnormalities the last time they were fired. There's a decent chance engines would explode if used again.

If we want to be able to take advantage of this kind of situation in the future, we'll need at least one of two things... More probes, just sitting around with more fuel to spare, or better detection abilities so we can find these objects with more time to get to them. I'm betting on the later approach.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What kind of trajectory is that assuming? The closest approach of 3l-Atlas to Jupiter is in March and will be 54 million km away. Is this end of the month timing to get it off of Jupiter's orbit and closer to 3l-Atlas's orbit? How will it achieve the 61km/sec intercept speed of the comet?

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

This would be a flyby, rather than orbiting, as that would take a lot more propellant. I'd assume they might use gravitational assist from Jupiter, but a more or less direct shot might be planned, not sure. 3I Atlas would be closest to Jupiter in early September, yes, coincidentally the same time Juno was expected to be deorbited. As far as achieving the velocity needed, there are some calculations yet to be done but apparently there could be enough propellant onboard to do it.

I heard about the intercept idea through The Angry Astronaut's youtube but there was a Congresswoman and some professors pushing it too.

(Angry Astronaut's recent video about an intercept mission) https://youtu.be/B6O7nuJcmpY