this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
687 points (95.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33803 readers
3984 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It's always lovely to be reminded that eugenics remains a popular idea so long as you don't call it that.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I get why you think that, but it does not say permanent.

If the birth control lasted 1-6 month to ensure active addicts would not have children, I would be kind of in favor of it. There is nothing good about a child being raised by meth addicts or taken by CPS and going through orphanages/foster care.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, this is a good idea for a big reason other than genes though, people who are currently addicted to meth shouldn't be having kids, not from a gene perspective but as an unfit parent and as an unsafe pregnancy standpoint.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 16 points 1 week ago

While I agree with you, the problem is, that it opens the door for a lot of other forms of eugenics. Once we decided that Meth users shouldn't have kids we can quickly expand the definition of who is "allowed to have kids". People who take LSD? Those psychopaths. Stoners? Homeless people? Black people?

It gives a certain group of people power over one of the most intimate secsectors of someone's private life. No one can guarantee, that at some point we are not the ones being included in the definition of "unfit for parenting" simply because we have the wrong political views or something like that.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 1 week ago

I mean we do take kids off crackheads. Repeatedly in some cases.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Looks like it’s time to reinvent the Torment Nexus from famed science fiction novel “Don’t Invent The Torment Nexus”. Maybe it will go well this time!

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We already practice eugenics. Its a term that covers a lot of things. There's a line between good eugenics and bad eugenics. I'd say secretly bputting birth control in drugs to control population is bad eugenics.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

This isn't an ethnic group or permanent, though. I think the bigger ethical issue is that birth control can have dangerous side effects.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not eugenics though, if anything it's a rather leftist stance that accepts that you can't control what people put in their body, but tries to mitigates harm for those who have no choice.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Controlling which people are allowed to reproduce is eugenics.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Absolutely, and like most abhorrent evil the first step is such a positive idea you cant possibly object.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Birth control pills are eugenics?

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

no, because people choose to take them

if they’re forced, then yes, it’s eugenics

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are not forced to take it, they can just not take the meth and have children.

I would really like your opinion on children being "forced" to have MMR vaccination in order to attend pre-school? Do you think it's immoral to take that bodily autonomy away in order to make it safer for all the rest of the children?

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

no, because MMR vaccines have been proven to be safe, and you are informed that your child must be vaccinated to go school; it’s not like the kid is vaccinated against their knowledge once they get there

birth control pills can have side effects, sometimes very detrimental, and in this hypothetical scenario they’re hidden in the meth, so you don’t even know it’s there

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Once again, the hypothetical that it's hidden, is only in your head, that sign doesn't say "hide birth control in meth", it's also fucking unrealistic, if it were to happen the only way it happens if it's legalized, controlled meth that has birth control added to it, or rather it could be that the users can get meth as long as they also take the birth control when they get the meth.

Also your worry about birthcontrol side effects with fucking meth users is goddamn laughable.

It's like going back to ww2 and telling the soldiers not to smoke because it's bad for their health, like the fucking bullets and explosives are way more detrimental to their health, don't you think?

[–] NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

These are all good points but they also apply to alcohol which is a hard drug and a teratogen (causes birth defects). I suspect that people would throw a hissy fit if this was suggested, yet it actually makes perfect logical sense. If meth comes with birth control then all known teratogenic recreational drugs should come with birth control, as no one should be consuming them while pregnant.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Prescribed with any sort of trickery, skullduggery, or hooliganism? Yes.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your interpretation presupposes malice and lack of transparency.

Almost anything can be made to look really bad with that attitude.

malice is irrelevant