this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
77 points (95.3% liked)

Space

1656 readers
187 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JeromeVancouver@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My first thought was, that is pretty awesome.

After thinking about it and reading your comment my thoughts are, don't nuclear reactors on earth take years to build? This process seems extremely difficult. Solar power makes so much sense.

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 7 points 6 days ago

NASA has already built prototype reactors for this purpose. They're small, highly efficient, and incredibly safe. The main thing is that the scale of power generation is vastly different here. A terrestrial nuclear reactor is generating hundreds of megawatts of electricity from (up to) gigawatts of thermal energy. We don't need that much power for a small moon base. 10-100 kilowatts would be just fine, especially if it's serving to supplement solar panels or batteries.

Nuclear power does have a really valid use-case in space. Solar panels should always be used first and foremost, but there are just times where they're not going to be enough.