this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
99 points (97.1% liked)

Tech

1687 readers
114 users here now

A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes

Things that fit:

Things that don't fit

Community Wiki

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Vacant@programming.dev
99
AWS accused of a ‘digital execution’ after it deleted 10 years of users' data without warning (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 3 days ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/tech@programming.dev
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A software engineer has warned against trusting cloud data storage services in a painstakingly detailed blog post detailing their own “complete digital annihilation” at the hands of AWS admins. Developer Abdelkader Boudih, pen name Seuros, says they had been a fee-paying AWS subscriber for a decade, with the cloud service becoming a firm part of their workflow. Suffice to say, the developer’s long-standing relationship with AWS has now ended acrimoniously.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maybe, but I dunno, AWS isn't advertised as a consumer cloud storage like OneDrive or Dropbox, right? It's object storage for people who understand technical things like this and who write programs that include things like a recycle bin for recovery.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All of the diligence in the world on your end does not matter if, on the AWS end, the employees can and do delete all of your data via fat-fingering without involving you at all, which is what happened here.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I guess so. I dunno. A 3 2 1 backup is pretty common around here. So even if someone deleted one copy, you'd have two left. Having a single place with all your data in the world just seems like a bad idea (yes I'm aware that this is the case for many users of cloud storage).

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

Sure, but the point is that he was supposedly paying AWS to have multiple backups in multiple regions, which he very carefully set up to maximize redundancy. If, at the end of the day, there is no actual redundancy because AWS itself is actually malicious insofar that it will delete all of your data for no good reason at all and then blame it on you, then they are being very dishonest about their product.