this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
485 points (98.8% liked)

politics

25084 readers
2327 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive article: https://archive.is/ksXfx

The Department of Homeland Security is looking to boost its deployment of the military on the streets of the U.S. in order to help carry out Donald Trump’s immigration policies, according to a leaked memo written by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s brother.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 144 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (20 children)

Usually this form of dictatorship falls pretty quickly.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's still a good chance he chickens out and holds actual elections this mid season and in 3 1/2 years.

We'll find out either way.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago

Even if everything changes Democrats are very good at doing nothing. Not to mention the amount of damage already done and the decades it would take to fix it.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Not sure they'll matter. The only party viably able to unseat some of the Republicans right now is shit on by the right, left, and center daily. Meaning the odds that people will show up in droves during a midterm to vote for them is minimal. And when the Republicans hold the Senate, they'll get Roberts, Thomas, and Alito to retire and Trump to replace them with far right justices who owe their lifelong cushy jobs to those Republicans. So we'll have ~16 years of Republican support in the Judicial branch all but guaranteed. When 33% of the government is owned by a party, all they have to do is secure 1 half on Congress and they can prevent the country from moving left.

The last administration "led" with 50% majority control of the government. This one leads with 100% majority control. It won't be easy to come back from.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And its being shit on because the repubs and their russian bot farms are pushing the narrative. We need to still vote and not give in.

[–] theolodis@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And because democrats still vote with republicans to provide more weapons to the genocidal state if isnotreal, when they could simply use the opposition to at least look like they'd fight for what is right, even if they can't change it. But they wouldn't even drop their Zionist buddies for the show.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So you refused to stop this already and now that the wheels are coming off your takeaway is to double-down that Democrats bad because “if isnotreal”.

Cool.

Look I don’t know what platform you’re avoiding being banned from by not saying “Israel” but this and your “Zionist buddies” language plus the Democrats-suck-lets-help-trump-some-more tells me all I need to know. Unless of course you have some plan that’s more than “shit on the Democrats”. Do you?

Yeah. That much is obvious.

[–] theolodis@feddit.org 0 points 11 hours ago

I am calling it Inotreal because isREAL suggests that they have legitimate claim there. Those are white people colonizing Palestine.

To your second point, I didn't do anything to stop that, because I am not american. But my point is that as long as there is no difference in policy between democrats and republicans, why should people care who wins? And yes, I understand that for you the stock market or relationships to other countries (that did now suffer) might be the most important, but some americans have family in the middle east, and to them the most important topic is the genocide in Palestine. If democrats refuse to provide an alternative on that matter, you'll never get those people to vote for them.

load more comments (17 replies)