this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
189 points (99.5% liked)

World News

48889 readers
1466 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ominouslemon@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The title is kind of genius.

BTW I don't see this as an actual issue. The important factor is which people read them. If it's journalist who then report on them, and politicians who then act, then they are still effective. I don't see why any average citizen should want to go and read them directly

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Vijay Prashad:

Such texts are boring not because of their content but because of how they are written. The style of these texts is almost intended to prevent the reader from getting anything out of them. It’s believed that just by publishing these manuals and reports they meet a certain standard of democracy. But what this kind of writing does is to turn people away from reading. Such writing is, therefore, antidemocratic.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like I comment this like once a week but plain language, y'all. Learn it, push it down people's throat. Force everyone you know to use it, especially if you work in any kind of writing environment. I'm done with academia, corporate, or other bullshit writing. We need accessibility.

Ironically, the UN itself includes plain language in its definition of communication (in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities).

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 13 hours ago

"Plain language? Similar to the wording used by the filthy plebeians? Pah!"

That also explains most countries' stupid legalese in how laws are written.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

To remain neutral or dispassionate to a freedom system is to be against freedom

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 1 points 18 hours ago

That seriously is not their job. Imagine you would go to a climate scientist or astrophysicist and demand he dumb down his article that is geared towards other experts of the field.

The language needs to fit a certain standard to ensure it is scientifically sound. It is the job of the media, which it usually does terribly, to then extract the key findings in a language for a wider audience.