this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
112 points (98.3% liked)

Linux Gaming

20443 readers
329 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (12 children)

What's not "actually native" about the nexus app?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Limo is designed soley to work on linux.

NM is multi-platform, ie, linux is an afterthought, after Windows.

Also Limo currently 'actually' has more functionality with a much more broad variety of games on linux than NM does... in that it works for literally any game.

Both 'apps' have been in development for about the same amount of time, and Limo has delivered far more linux functionality, with far less jank and bugs, in the same timeframe, thus indicating Limo is much more serious about linux support than NM.

Just go look at the issues section of the github for each and you can see that for NM, there are tons of major problems with both the released AppImage and people trying to build from source on linux.

The Nexus folks either are not prioritizing linux, or are not very good at developing for linux, or both.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (6 children)

What makes a multi-platform app default to treating Linux as an afterthought? If that's the case, it's true for most KDE apps as well; most notably in my mind would be Krita.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The part where it has way, way more bugs and problems on linux than it does on windows.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

NM is multi-platform, ie, linux is an afterthought, after Windows.

That's what you said, right? That multi-platform apps put Linux last. Seems pretty clear you don't know what you're talking about.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Multi platform apps often do a shoddy job of fully and/or properly supporting linux, this is very common.

So common that WINE and Proton exist, to just reroute around that problem without forcing every software dev to also become a linux software dev.

The NM is yet another example of that, its honestly not even really remarkable, its to be expected from devs that are entirely used to developing on windows.

Do some linux devs also do a bad job of properly supporting a full array of DEs? X11 vs Wayland?

Yep, that's pretty common as well, this is why many serious distros at least attempt to pick sets of prebundled software, that work best with the DEs and WMs they support fully support, or even develop their own apps, or contribute to apps they like, such that the overall user experience on their distro is less janky and more congruent.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So, therefore, you believe apps like Krita are doing a shoddy job of supporting Linux, right?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No?

Krita picks a DE lane, stays with it, and it works well?

I run Krita on a Gnome DE fairly often... works fine?

I've never noticed a serious problem.

Its got detailed build documentation if you want to build it, its got an appimage that actually works, a flatpak that works fine.

You are the one that brought up DE support as an analogy to... the actual core functions of an app working or not working properly.

Krita has no problems on either of those fronts... its entirely possible to get an app from basically one DE working in another in a fairly straightforward to the user way, if you know how to actually properly set up an app image or flatpak... which the Krita team does.

Like uh, if you picked an older, buggier app designed for KDE, that hasn't been updated in a decade, and barfs all over modern KDE or Gnome or w/e then yeah, yeah I'd say that app is no longer well supported on linux, in general, as most linux users generally use at least a fairly recent version of either Gnome or KDE.

You're just fully committing to your red herring / non sequitur argument here, not really sure why.

Well, Krita is multi-platform, so how could it run well on Linux?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)