this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
64 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

4118 readers
186 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 21 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The biggest extraction of wealth from public to private hands wasn't privatisation of any utility or pumping money into "too big to fail banks" it was right to buy. And it was all fueled by Thatcher's belief that council tenants vote Labour so we should get them to buy their houses.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And then stop the local councils from building more by kneecapping their authority and reducing their funding.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is it right here. If the provision were made that councils could take the money from the sales and build more up to date housing for each generation then right to buy would have been an accidentally utopian policy that bank rolled housing safety for everyone forever - fuelling more Tory votes. Instead we got 13 years of Blair. Cheers Maggie!

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Absolutely! It would have been a virtuous cycle:

Council builds house -> worker moves into house -> with house has enough stability to get a job -> works job, gets a few promotions, finds partner to settle down with -> couple work hard to save up to buy the house -> buy house from council -> couple settle into new house with kids they can pass the property onto -> council has enough money from that sale to build another house -> couple's kids grow up complete their education and need employment -> the grown kids move into a council house and start looking for jobs.

load more comments (4 replies)