this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
139 points (69.9% liked)

/0 Governance

259 readers
40 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi again mateys!

As most of you are probably aware, since the development of Lemvotes Lemmy votes are no longer private for users.

The way lemvotes works right now afaik, is it uses an admin level account to collect voting data from all federated instances, thus enabling the identification of every voter. This method effectively bypasses the guardrails the developers put in place to keep this info more restricted.

However, the developer of lemvotes has recently developed an "opt out" for instances that don't want their user data collected in this way. So now we have a choice of whether or not to continue. For total transparency, I asked the developer to create an opt out because I wanted to give our users the option to choose that path without defederating from the lemvotes instance.

I think there are (at least) two schools of thought on this topic, which I will attempt to succinctly summarize below:

  1. Votes should be kept private to users as they were only ever meant to be viewable by instance admins. Making votes public to everyone via lemvotes, when users have a reasonable expectation of privacy when it comes to voting, is a betrayal of user trust. It also leads to arguments and a lot of unnecessary drama, caused by users trawling though each others' vote histories.

  2. It's good that voting is transparent and that users have the same tools available as admins to conduct their own investigations into other users. This creates a level playing field and helps hold everyone accountable for their voting patterns.

So now you have some of the context, I'd like to ask our community what are your thoughts on lemvotes... is it a social good or a bad idea?

Personally, I quite like it from an admin perspective - it's a handy tool, and a pretty cool project. But I also have an expectation (mainly from other forms of social media) that users' votes should be kept private from other users, so I still think it's problematic from that perspective.


Proposal: To opt out of lemvotes, so that our users' voting data is kept (at least somewhat) private.

  • To vote FOR the proposal to succeed, upvote the post.
  • To vote AGAINST the proposal, downvote the post.

This will be a simple majority vote. Similar to the last governance topic, I have no clue what the instance sentiment is towards lemvotes, so let's find out! Feel free to add your comments below.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnrefinedChihuahua@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've read a few comments here. I'm not sure I fully understand, but,

  1. With Lemmyvotes anyone can see anyone's voting history.

  2. Without Lemmyvotes, someone would either need to be an admin (is mod enough?) of an existing federated instance, or they could spool up their own instance to become an admin, which in turn makes them able to see my votes.

Option 2 makes it more work and I'd rather there was a hurdle to seeing my vote history than not.

[–] dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

exactly, and it's a STANCE for privacy. It gives off the signal for the future devs that privacy is still desired

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no path forward within the activity pub universe to achieve that. Voting would need to be completely removed.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not quite. Pifed or something does a like slushfund for votes. When you make an account it makes a user that votes for you. Admins of course know who is whom.

Still vulnerable to correlation attacks and stuff but we're getting pathological now. Still YOUR COMMENT HISTORY is necessarily public and eternal, so maybe just realising that social media is public is the thing to do.

Go to dread and enjoy that if you want anon socmed. It has good and bad aspects, activitypub is for broadcasting to all listeners how crap you are :p

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That’s actually an avenue I hadn’t thought of. Though it does open things up to malicious/spam voting with a bit of a smoke screen that requires admins from another instance to cooperate to handle.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

See Lena (the dev)'s explanation. Option 2 also includes just using Kbin and Mbin.