64
Physicists Superheated Gold to Hotter Than the Sun's Surface and Disproved a 40-Year-Old Idea
(www.smithsonianmag.com)
General discussions about "science" itself
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
Sort of reminds me of the energy-time version uncertainty principle: if an interval is short enough, energy fluctuations can be extremely high.
What I'd like to know here is what the duration threshold to would allow fusion to start is.
Energy-time relations have no link to the uncertainty principle. They apply to classical cameras for instance. There are no "energy fluctuations", you cannot magically get energy from nothing as long as you give it back quickly, like some kind of loan.
This is because the energy-time relation works for particular kinds of time, like lifetime of excitations or shutter times on cameras. Not just any time coordinate value.
Edit: down votes from the scientifically illiterate are fun. Let's not listen to a domain expert, let's quote wiki and wallow in collective ignorance.
Whether it's energy-time or position-momentum, the uncertainty principle is just a consequence of two variables being linked via Fourier transform. So position and wave-vector therefore position and momentum, ans time and pulse and therefore time and energy. Sure, it only has consequences when you're looking at time uncertainties and probabilistic durations, which is less common than space distributions. And sure it also happens in classical optics, that's where all of this comes from. And I agree that "quantum fluctuations" is often a weird misleading term to talk about uncertainties. But I'm not sure how you end up with "no link to the uncertainty principle"? It's literally the same relation between intervals in direct or Fourier space.