this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
171 points (98.9% liked)

Work Reform

13231 readers
229 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago (11 children)
[–] technomad@slrpnk.net 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Grounds for serious litigation right there

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

They'll drag it out until the poors give up.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think it is unfortunately because this is completely legal as long as it was laid out in the terms of the stock when it was purchased.

This isn't preferred stock that we're talking about, this is common stock and most of the time that type of stock is given out to employees as like an incentive program and generally hold no actual weight in the company itself and is the least priority when these types of sales occur.

Basically, if they wanted to initiate litigation on this, their argument would have to be either that they were misled of the type of stock that they were purchasing, or that they didn't adequately state the financial risks of the stock.

By all means, I think they should try, especially that guy that said that they invested $10 million into that company and is losing it. I just don't think it will go anywhere.

[–] technomad@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

Of course, what a sleazy concept too. That is definitely unfortunate, if that's the case. Thanks for the explanation.

load more comments (8 replies)