Superbowl

4787 readers

345 users here now

For owls that are superb.

Also visit our twinned community for wholesome content: https://lemmy.world/c/wholesome@reddthat.com

US Wild Animal Rescue Database: Animal Help Now

International Wildlife Rescues: RescueShelter.com

Australia Rescue Help: WIRES

Germany-Austria-Switzerland-Italy Wild Bird Rescue: wildvogelhilfe.org

If you find an injured owl:

Note your exact location so the owl can be released back where it came from. Contact a licensed wildlife rehabilitation specialist to get correct advice and immediate assistance.

Minimize stress for the owl. If you can catch it, toss a towel or sweater over it and get it in a cardboard box or pet carrier. It should have room to be comfortable but not so much it can panic and injure itself. If you can’t catch it, keep people and animals away until help can come.

Do not give food or water! If you feed them the wrong thing or give them water improperly, you can accidentally kill them. It can also cause problems if they require anesthesia once help arrives, complicating procedures and costing valuable time.

If it is a baby owl, and it looks safe and uninjured, leave it be. Time on the ground is part of their growing up. They can fly to some extent and climb trees. If animals or people are nearby, put it up on a branch so it’s safe. If it’s injured, follow the above advice.

For more detailed help, see the OwlPages Rescue page.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

dragonfly@lemmy.world

Smokeless7048@lemmy.world

119

Nose Job (infosec.pub)

submitted 5 days ago by anon6789@lemmy.world to c/superbowl@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

From Blackland Prairie Raptor Center

Nose Job? This Eastern Screech Owl came to our Rehab Center with some blood above its cere. The cere is a waxy fleshy covering above a bird's beak just below the eyes, where the nostrils (nares) are located. The owl is patiently sitting while our staff cleans the cere.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You had me excited to read about this all day, but I was traveling and couldn't get to it until now.

I read the study paper and for the most part there wasn't too much more to it than what you said, but then the conclusion has me a little confused.

The fact that parents responded to a manipulation of UV reflectance of their offspring can not be due to UV coloration, because owls probably do not have a VS or UVS cone (Bowmaker & Martin 1978) and, at night, there probably is not enough light for colour vision. It is possible that the measured effect was due to a change in perceived brightness mediated by scotopic (rod) vision. Compared to diurnal species, owls have very few cones in their rod- dominated retina (Hart 2001). Owls, like some bats (e.g. Winter et al. 2003), may have a UV- transmitting lens and cornea and so the secondary (beta) peak of the pigment in their rods would capture UV light contributing to achromatic vision at low light levels. It is also possible that, even at low light levels, photopic discrimination was involved, but again the effect of UV would be via the stimulation of the beta peak of pigments in the cones. It has been reported that owls have cones containing oil droplets that are either colourless or only a pale yellow (Walls 1942), which presumably transmit UV light.

So if it's not a coloration difference, does that mean they are just seeing a brighter type of grey (greater amplitude) or are they seeing something else?

I'd like to learn more about their UV seeing abilities, but I feel in over my head. I feel this paper is pretty jargon heavy.

Very interesting stuff though!

[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't know. My knowledge stems from my biology classes at school and what my parents told me. And that was some time ago. :) I didn't know the word cere, so I looked it up and found the UV part about owls and felt the urge to share it. I didn't look into that study until now.

I'd like to know more too, but I don't think I have the energy to pull through if I'd dive into that rabbit hole. So I won't try. :)

The authors state: Rods are responsible for the gray scale scotopic vision under low light conditions - so grey scale brightness, only. The cones are not relevant because it is too dark. Or are they? There are those oily cones which maybe can detect UV light? If so: still no colors, just brightness. To me it looks like the authors of the study offered some educated guesses.

I would say it means: Either it is greyscale brightness but maybe it is something else. But the authors don't know. They just know that the owl perceived the difference.

It looks like the owl's eyeball doesn't absorb the upper range of UV-light (350nm+) so it could reach the owls receptor cells: https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/224/20/jeb243129/272645/Lens-and-cornea-limit-UV-vision-of-birds-a

I didn't find anything about that secondary (beta) peak that I could understand - maybe it is about the biochemistry in the rod/cone which can be split into phases when light hits the cell. I'm lost here. The google-LLM pointed me here: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3265844/ I'm not even sure, if this is a match for our context.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lol sorry, I knew I should have been more specific I was just questioning in general, not asking you specifically to answer! 😁

At least we sound like we've understood it in pretty similar ways.

[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago

No worries. I wouldn't have looked into it, if I wasn't interested.:)