this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
73 points (98.7% liked)

Apple

19243 readers
195 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I don't understand. Is he proud of the fact that so many other companies add new features decades before they can figure it out?

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes, he is because history has shown that 'the first' is rarely ever the best or most successful. Apple builds success by letting others do the hard work. It is a strategy they've used extremely successfully for decades.

[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Exactly. And when they do try and be the first mover, they invent the PDA with the Newton and bomb fucking hard.

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Like the Apple II then ?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

That's Apple marketing nonsense.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yes and no. They do have a history of late market entries that eventually dominate a category for a bit. Portable music players, wireless headphones, smart phones, wearables, etc.

[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Pretty much everything they’ve ever released was a fast follower except the Newton (PDA). They’re not a first mover kind of org.

[–] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago

"No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame."

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He’s making excuses. Honestly if Apple waits long enough, the AI bubble will pop and it won’t matter anymore.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apple could do us a solid for once and advertise the lack of "AI" as a benefit and let others follow suit.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 2 points 8 hours ago

no idea what this would actually disable but fwiw you can

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

He’s talking about bigger things than an option or preference in iOS. He’s talking about not being the first VR headset. Not being the first digital music player. Not being the first smart phone.

But it’s still a bit odd to be saying. Because he’s actually boasting. He’s implying we do things once we know how to do them better than the first movers. But this is preemptive boasting. Their stuff isn’t ready yet. It isn’t proven to be great, let alone better than competitors.

He should be saving this line for the interviews after “Actually intelligent Siri” exists. If it ever does. They have a lot of years of frustration with Siri to make up for.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 23 hours ago

anything to assuage the anxious stockholders

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

He’s talking about not being the first VR headset.

Yes because that worked out so well for them...

Not being the first digital music player.

You're right. But the only thing Apple had over those other music players was marketing.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Did you ever get to use one of the old iPods with a click wheel interface? That thing is a genuine legend of engineering, and deservedly so. They definitely spent a lot on marketing, but marketing wasn’t their only advantage.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yes I did. But admittedly very young. How was it a "legend of engineering"?

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

It says you could use it without looking at it. Which was true of all music players at the time. Many didn't even have a display. What else ya got?

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago
[–] warm@kbin.earth 1 points 11 hours ago

Iconic, not legendary engineering, the click wheel got annoying, scrolling over tracks you wanted select, scrolling when you click it, etc, it was far from perfect.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

But the only thing Apple had over those other music players was marketing.

That's rich. At the very least they had the first consumer touchscreen smartphone.

[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Technically that was the LG Prada a few months before the iPhone. The iPhone was the first multitouch smartphone however.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That was a luxury luxury phone and the reason I wrote "consumer". but now I realize luxury things are also consumer goods-

[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

The first iPhone was something like $600 vs the Prada at $750 or something. Both were certainly “luxury”. Especially compared to say my BlackBerry Pearl I had around that time which was around $200.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Let everyone else prove it sucks first. Easy W strategy.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

This has been a thing Apple started loudly touting in the middle of the Jobs’ second time as CEO. CD burners, MP3s / digital audio files, wearables, etc. They often intentionally enter a market late.