this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
84 points (97.7% liked)

Fediverse

35867 readers
236 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It has an excellent web layout/app (Interstellar) and has Mastodon baked in along with Lemmy. It's a very elegant catch all piece of fediverse software.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 19 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Lemmy and Piefed are much more 1:1 reddit replacements. Mbin is it's own thing, which is very high quality, but has less out of the box appeal to someone looking for "fediverse reddit".

[–] dudenas@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Mastodon (and others a la twitter) is actor-centric, where focus is on people.

Lemmy (and others a la reddit) is topic-centric, where focus is on common interests.

These two are very different approaches that I can hardly see mixing well. I thought of "microblogs" of mbin as a "nice to have" but unnecessary functionality. Did it actually lift off?

[–] dudenas@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Started to argue with myself: if the concepts of following people and topics did not mix well, how could fb reach a couple bilion users? I myself silently hope for Bonfire to succeed, even after seeing Friendica, Hubzilla and almost forgotten Diaspora. Maybe it just wasnt done rght in FOSS so far?

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Reddit was a fusion of old forums and Digg before it nuked itself.

I never cared for Facebook or Twitter style following people, threads in a topic board feels just more natural.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)