this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
372 points (96.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

12831 readers
947 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bryndos@fedia.io 59 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I really like those stealth bike racks where they put a car shape on the road facing side so that the cars don't get upset that they lost a potential parking spot.

They'll never see through this clever ruse;. Most cars have pretty poor eyesight; the only way they'll figure it out is if they honk at it, and it doesn't respond convincingly.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I would legitimately love a study on whether this makes drivers more or less likely to be angry, because anything other than complete neutrality would be hilarious.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Haha, yeah. If you like, I can design a really cheap study with a small enough sample size that the chances of 50% are lower than either 0 or 100.

That's how science works right, exploit the logistic distribution for the LOLs (and funding from an interest group). Aw shit-bags, this is not sciencemems,

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 21 minutes ago

Shit you caught me, Big Bike paid me off to laugh at carbrains.

load more comments (4 replies)