this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
195 points (99.5% liked)

Music

9911 readers
88 users here now

↳ Our family Communities:

➰#Music

Music.world - !music@lemmy.world

Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world

Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world

Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee

Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee

Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world

Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com

60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world

70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world

80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world

90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/aSaAL

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (15 children)

I wish there was an ethical independent streaming service. I buy albums still but it's hard to discover new stuff without it.

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Great except for audio quality. I don't understand why they stubbornly refuse to improve it. I'd be willing to pay more for a higher audio quality tier.

I check to see if they've improved every now and again because I think their stations made from a song or artist (my preferred way to listen) are without peer, but until they get their shit together I'm sticking with Tidal.

Tidal also lets you do a lot of things Pandora doesn't: scrub thorough any track, play more specific songs instead of waiting for them to come up, see the whole queue it generated and play anything on it, and a few other things but I would happily give it all up for Pandora's superior station generation if they would only get higher quality audio.

load more comments (13 replies)