16
‘Self-termination is most likely’: the history and future of societal collapse
(www.theguardian.com)
/c/
and crosspost if you are displeased with the rulesWhat does that even mean?
Here's an aspect: https://www.radicalphilosophy.com/article/nature-in-the-limits-to-capital-and-vice-versa
Top fig. from https://www.degrowthinstitute.org/challenge-growth01
*delusion that we have created artificial intelligence
In terms of what kind of history you can make a living covering in a "pop-science" fashion yes, but this is a MASSIVE claim to make without serious conclusive evidence proving this is what motivates the trajectory of history primarily.
Why isn't History best told as a story of lawmakers attempting to create a sustainable coherent body of laws that don't collapse inwards eventually?
Why isn't History best told as a story of revolutions in domestic labor technology? The pottery wheel, the loom, the dishwasher... etc...
Why isn't History best told as a story of different meals and culinary traditions?
Why isn't History best told as a story of organized religion, friendship, communities, or ideologies?
We choose to see history this way and in doing so play right into the hands of the ruling class. The act of retelling History by necessity must challenge the primacy of authoritarian regimes in the human story because otherwise all History does is retell the propaganda of the past.
Fully agree.
History is made by the people, and under constant threat of being stolen by the ruling class.
We must firmly keep what is ours, and keep its memories alive and well lest we fall to the same mistakes, cruelties, and hopelessness the autocrats try to impose.