Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
view the rest of the comments
No, its just that if you own a car there you'll have to put it elsewhere, whether that's buying a parking spot elsewhere or finding street parking.
I live in an apartment without parking (ok there are spots for more than I'm willing to pay extra) and so I park a ways away and am more of a walker than a driver.
If new buildings dont have spots, and everyone parks on the street, and there is finite street space; how do you continue to park your car?
Because new buildings don't need spots there becomes less need for cars. This stage is awkward for some people but part of it is thst places like this are supposed to be places not everyone needs a car.
Less parking spots ... ? ... Less need for cars. Im not really connecting the dots here. I live in a place where lots of hlusing was built pre war without parking spots. There are not less cars there, just greater competition for street parking in those neighborhoods. Its actually more car dense brcause there is nowhere else for the cars to gonother than the street (and crosswalks, and hydrants, etc).
In the nieghborhoods with newer buildings that have parking, there are less cars taking up space on the road.
Was public transit builr there? I live somewhere built around a public transit system, but around the edge of it. The people who live and work deeper in the city don't need cars, but the people whose lives revolve around further from the city do. This allows for less raw space taken up by things like a metric fuckton of parking like it was back when I lived in a city that was anomalously large to not have a light rail at all by American standards.
What does that actually mean though? Neighborhoods deeper in the city can fit a lot more stuff within walking distance, while here you're walking past a fair bit of parking lot as you walk around, but much further out going without a car means you're either biking or you're hiking
Public transit exists for sure, but it does not connect in infinite ways. Its just not possible to beat the freedom and concenience of personal transport. Public transport has ita place and is very important. The better connected it is, the more options one has to use it over their cars. Bikes are cool, if you are fit enough to use them. Motorcycles and scooters are cool if you dont have to bring home a bunch of groceries, etc.
I have a car, but i dont use it 100% of the time. Sometimes it juat makes sense to use PT. I would never want to be without the car though because it just so much more efficient in terms of time for most cases. Keyword here is most.