this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

3223 readers
101 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I am assuming this is tied to Lip-Bu Tan "cleaning house", but I can't get rid of the feeling that Tan is leaning towards exit out do the foundry business.

If they do exit (they said that's what they will do if they get no flagship customers for 14A), I wonder if they will go with TSMC exclusively?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I can’t get rid of the feeling that Tan is leaning towards exit out do the foundry business.

I get that vibe too, that Patton guy apparently has huge experience in working with foundry customers. If Intel is giving up on trying to get customers to their foundry, they are at the vary least planning on scaling down. And scaling down is not really an option, if you want to be a leading foundry.

This looks really bad for Intel.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Scaling down is definitely not an option.

If Intel's foundry gets shut down, this will also be very bad for consumers.