this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
35 points (97.3% liked)

Hardware

3223 readers
103 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't have professional experience in semiconductor contracts, but it seems unlikely that an upfront payment format would be used; I would assume payments (i.e. revenue and profit) would be tied to quarterly unit delivery figures (more in Q3/Q3 to cover season demand peak).

Perhaps this is tied to intra-company transactions (decline in Exynos fab orders?); but I would still think Switch 2 SoC should have a positive impact on current profit. They didn't just sign a contract on near break even terms, did they? :)

[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I was thinking it may be a mix of both, an upfront contract last year, and continual payments

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Unless someone with experience in such contracts is using Lemmy (and reading this community), we can only speculate. :)