this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
124 points (73.7% liked)

/0 Governance

258 readers
267 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi again mateys!

As most of you are probably aware, since the development of Lemvotes Lemmy votes are no longer private for users.

The way lemvotes works right now afaik, is it uses an admin level account to collect voting data from all federated instances, thus enabling the identification of every voter. This method effectively bypasses the guardrails the developers put in place to keep this info more restricted.

However, the developer of lemvotes has recently developed an "opt out" for instances that don't want their user data collected in this way. So now we have a choice of whether or not to continue. For total transparency, I asked the developer to create an opt out because I wanted to give our users the option to choose that path without defederating from the lemvotes instance.

I think there are (at least) two schools of thought on this topic, which I will attempt to succinctly summarize below:

  1. Votes should be kept private to users as they were only ever meant to be viewable by instance admins. Making votes public to everyone via lemvotes, when users have a reasonable expectation of privacy when it comes to voting, is a betrayal of user trust. It also leads to arguments and a lot of unnecessary drama, caused by users trawling though each others' vote histories.

  2. It's good that voting is transparent and that users have the same tools available as admins to conduct their own investigations into other users. This creates a level playing field and helps hold everyone accountable for their voting patterns.

So now you have some of the context, I'd like to ask our community what are your thoughts on lemvotes... is it a social good or a bad idea?

Personally, I quite like it from an admin perspective - it's a handy tool, and a pretty cool project. But I also have an expectation (mainly from other forms of social media) that users' votes should be kept private from other users, so I still think it's problematic from that perspective.


Proposal: To opt out of lemvotes, so that our users' voting data is kept (at least somewhat) private.

  • To vote FOR the proposal to succeed, upvote the post.
  • To vote AGAINST the proposal, downvote the post.

This will be a simple majority vote. Similar to the last governance topic, I have no clue what the instance sentiment is towards lemvotes, so let's find out! Feel free to add your comments below.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This instance is based greatly on sailing the high seas. Privacy should go hand in hand with that. I don't want my votes to be "investigated" as they reflect my personal opinions and that is sacrosanct.

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

On ActivityPub, all votes are public by design. They are only hidden so users can focus on discussion rather than "who did what". Anyone with an AP instance or tools like this can view your sacrosanct opinions whether you opt out or not.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So it seems like this discussion should be aimed moreso at ActivityPub, not Lemvotes

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I absolutely agree. What does lemmy achieve over reddit if it is not more private?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Not corporatly owned and federated. Federation has positives and negatives. This has been a known "negative" from the start. It's why some instances don't show the down vote arrow, or don't show either. It's all about instance choice. But if you opt to vote, it is known by all, because when you click that button, your user just sent a message to everyone on activitypub that you pressed that button.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago

To echo another user, "should we not be voting about federation with Activity Pub?"

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago

Understandable but not what this proposal would achieve. The data is available, this is just one of the interfaces showing it.

This one can be easily opted out of, other existing ones cannot.

[–] NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago

Except that's not how any of this works. Votes are public via the ActivityPub protocol, which is why this tool is possible in the first place. Kbin ane Mbin make votes public, so all you need to do to see this is use one of those instances federated with dbzero. This kind of comment is just being ignorant of the technology and mechanics in place. If you wanted that kind of privacy you shouldn't be on this platform. You should probably not be on a public forum with actual usernames. Maybe try 4chan?