this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
34 points (97.2% liked)
Hardware
3223 readers
101 users here now
All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.
Rules (Click to Expand):
-
Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about
-
Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.
-
No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.
-
Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.
-
Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).
-
If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.
Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:
- Augmented Reality - !augmented_reality@lemmy.world
- Gaming Laptops - !gaminglaptops@lemmy.world
- Laptops - !laptops@lemmy.world
- Linux Hardware - !linuxhardware@programming.dev
- Mechanical Keyboards - !mechanical_keyboards@programming.dev
- Microcontrollers - !microcontrollers@lemux.minnix.dev
- Monitors - !monitors@piefed.social
- Raspberry Pi - !raspberry_pi@programming.dev
- Retro Computing - !retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org
- Single Board Computers - !sbcs@lemux.minnix.dev
- Virtual Reality - !virtualreality@lemmy.world
Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Where did the $4.64 billion a year ago profit in the chip division come from? I don't remember any major customer wins in 2024 and one would think with Samsung fabbing the Switch 2 SoC, there would be an increase in absolute profit values (if not margins).
Maybe last year is when the contract for the Switch 2 was signed and paid?
It’s quite likely that Switch 2 have been in production for a couple of years already given massive stockpiles they had for release. There’s plenty of circumstantial evidence that they delayed Switch 2 because Switch 1 was selling like hotcakes and there was no good launch lineup.
I don't have professional experience in semiconductor contracts, but it seems unlikely that an upfront payment format would be used; I would assume payments (i.e. revenue and profit) would be tied to quarterly unit delivery figures (more in Q3/Q3 to cover season demand peak).
Perhaps this is tied to intra-company transactions (decline in Exynos fab orders?); but I would still think Switch 2 SoC should have a positive impact on current profit. They didn't just sign a contract on near break even terms, did they? :)
I was thinking it may be a mix of both, an upfront contract last year, and continual payments
Unless someone with experience in such contracts is using Lemmy (and reading this community), we can only speculate. :)