this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
89 points (100.0% liked)

Legal News

553 readers
151 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is all just a steaming pile of bullshit.

The current US Supreme Court hands Trump victories without explaining them because the explanation is quite simply that the conservative majority is wholly and completely corrupt and compromised. There is no legitimate justification for their decisions - neither existing law, precedent nor the Constitution could possibly be successfully invoked to justify any of them, and trying would just call unwanted attention to that fact, so they don't even bother trying.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The justification is "What the fuck are you going to do about it?"

The normal process is born out of an awareness that people can bite back sometimes, and so "they" will take seriously trying to justify their actions. After a while, things get quiescent, and some of "they" start fooling themselves that it is impossible that the people not on top would ever bite back, and they stop bothering themselves with worrying about it.

For some reason (as with pretty much any other "what the fuck are you doing to do about it" situation), when people do do something about it, it's all of a sudden an outrageous betrayal, an offense against decency that no one could have seen coming.

A court that strongly supports the second amendment should not drive the populous to believe it is their only option.

load more comments (2 replies)