Actual Discussion

959 readers

2 users here now

Are you tired of going into controversial threads and having people not discuss things, circlejerking, or using emotional responses in place of logic? Us too.

Welcome to Actual Discussion!

DO:

Be civil. This doesn't mean you shouldn't challenge people, just don't be a dick.
Upvote interesting or well-articulated points, even if you may not agree.
Be prepared to back up any claims you make with an unbiased source.
Be willing to be wrong and append your initial post to show a changed view.
Admit when you are incorrect or spoke poorly. Upvote when you see others correct themselves or change their mind.
Feel free to be a "Devil's Advocate". You do not have to believe either side of an issue in order to generate solid points.
Discuss hot-button issues.
Add humour, and be creative! Dry writing isn't super fun to read or discuss.

DO NOT:

Call people names or label people. We fight ideas, not people here.
Ask for sources, and then not respond to the person providing them.
Mindlessly downvote people you disagree with. We only downvote people that do not add to the discussion.
Be a bot, spam, or engage in self-promotion.
Duplicate posts from within the last month unless new information is surfaced on the topic.
Strawman.
Expect that personal experience or morals are a substitute for proof.
Exaggerate. Not everyone slightly to the right of you is a Nazi, and not everyone left of you is a Tankie.
Copy an entire article in your post body. It's just messy. Link to it, summarize, and add your thoughts.

For more casual conversation instead of competitive ranked conversation, try: !casualconversation@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

AceTKen@lemmy.ca

jet@hackertalks.com

(WEEKLY) "Post-Revolution" (infosec.pub)

submitted 1 day ago by AceTKen@lemmy.ca to c/actual_discussion@lemmy.ca

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. We try to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are highly encouraged as no-discussion downvotes don't help anyone learn anything valuable. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

We’re back! Instead of putting a neutral topic in the introduction, I'm placing a bit of opinion on an issue to see if it helps spur discussion. We are also actively seeking moderators and people who enjoy discussion (and understand that being wrong is an important part of being a better person)! Send me a message if you’d like to help out.

This week, I'd like to discuss something that I've not seen discussed much elsewhere.

Many on Lemmy are the type to want to see their government go through a revolution of some kind and think that slow change is impossible, but what happens after? Say you get a group and topple the oligarchy or shitty government in power, what then?

Some Starters (and don’t feel you have to speak on all or any of them if you don’t care to):

How do you defend what you're building from those who have more resources than you?
What does the government look like?
Would you keep anything from the old systems?
What kind of leaders would you need?
How do you stop it from turning into the NEXT horrible thing?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

How do you defend what you're building from those who have more resources than you?

More like how do you prevent outside influences from reinstalling the previous government? History has shown that wealthy elites will help each other collectively maintain power.

What does the government look like?

This really depends on how bloodless this revolution is. If it's extremely bloody we may just see a less ludicrous version of the Taliban's government post US-exit. Where the new government lacks individuals with authentic public service experience.

Would you keep anything from the old systems?

The old systems will likely come back if not replaced with something better.

What kind of leaders would you need?

Not the ones calling for this crayon consumer rhetoric. You'd need people who have both experience and community ties. The people calling for violent revolution have neither of those.

How do you stop it from turning into the NEXT horrible thing?

You can't post-revolution. The inevitable outcome will be determined by how the revolution is achieved.