this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
58 points (95.3% liked)
Futurology
3081 readers
136 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I find it misleading that they call it "100 hour battery". What's the point?
I'd rather see information about the price per kWh or energy density.
Edit: It even sounds bad, when I think about it now. What would you rather have: A battery that can charge and discharge fast or one that is slow in this matter? If this startup wants to succeed, it needs to beat lithium-based batteries in cost.
energy density doesnt matter that much for a landbased stationary battery
You're right. But still, some hard specs would be interesting
Oh absolutely. An article like this useless babble of buzzwords sucks.