this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
293 points (98.7% liked)

politics

25045 readers
1924 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He's not planning on leaving.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Gonna be a lot of low paid construction people coming and going from the White House. Be a shame if something were to happen...

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nah. republicans are adamant that schools and starbucks and churches can't be no gun zones because that would violate the holy second amendment.

But any time it actually matters to them? Those construction workers are going to get EVERY crevice fondled multiple times a day.

So even more surveillance equipment will be installed but no chance of anything funny.


That also assumes he would be anywhere near the noise of construction. Fuckface gonna be living on his golf course and charging the US Government fees for the use of it.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For someone to get to work on a government site, you have to pass a background check. Since Secret Service is involved, they will check social media as well.

Clark Construction is doing most of the building, outside of the engineering construction, and they are actually fairly good in the industry. They intentionally provide a starting point to get into trades with pre-apprenticeship employment, which is huge in construction trades. Wages and benefits are on par with national averages for non-union labor.

The lowest paid people are "helpers" and they fuck up plenty when they try not to and aren't allowed to touch anything that could be of consequence. At most they could write a message on something nobody will see until the next renovation.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Guaranteed to have money laundry

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

~~low paid~~ unpaid construction people

FTFY

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's who built it in the first place. Trump is accidentally following an historical precedent.

Remember when trump got a bunch of undocumented Eastern European (polish I believe) immigrants to do the demolition and excavation work on the property that would become trump tower through the connections of his mafia consiglieri McCarthyite fixer lawyer Roy Cohn (who also had connections to human trafficking rings and a home for orphaned boys in norther ireland that MI5 and MI6 were using to recruit children to be abused for the purposes of Kompromat farming and blackmail rackets almost identical to the kind of operation Epstein and maxwell(whom trump met several years after Cohn died in ‘86)were running and then when the immigrant labor team, who had been contracted to do the work due to their very low bid, was finished with the work they were reported to immigration enforcement and then deported and trump saved a bunch of money by not having to pay what was owed on their services….. and then trump did something similar in Atlantic City by just refusing to pay contractors because it was cheaper to fight them in court and or settle since most couldn’t afford legal representation and many ended up going bankrupt. Trump’s excuse for this was that they did bad work but many of the contractors whom he did this to, litigated against and settled with he had the audacity to request them to do more work after the fact. So i can imagine what kind of fraud he is going to pull on this monstrosity of a neo-gilded age ball room but I would expect at least for trump to pocket half of the over inflated estimate and them cut as many corners as possible to try and further skim more off the top. Like how has this fuck not been prosecuted for violating the emoluments clause? It should really also include family members acting on behalf of the president’s past present and future business interests. This administration and subsequently the entire country as a result are in such a mess. And we can thank Roy Cohn for teaching trump how to brazenly commit fraud and get away with it continuously.

It would be awful if someone finally did the thing

And going off his previous projects, its gonna be done as cheaply as humanly possible. Gold paint on Styrofoam turds.

Sigh.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They'll cordon off the East wing.