this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
1151 points (98.4% liked)
196
18144 readers
761 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There's nothing wrong with working at McDonald's.
But it's a fact that people often work in fast food because they can't get a job elsewhere. That doesn't mean they don't deserve a living wage, but it does mean that people who alienate potential employers by being intentionally obnoxious are more likely to end up there.
So you're saying you're unemployed?
Not at all. I'm quite gainfully employed, partially because I'm not intentionally obnoxious to my clients.
So you are able to not be intentionally obnoxious. I honestly wasn't sure.
Just everyone that isn't "your client," huh? Is "your client" in the room with us?
All his clients are in Canada.
Sorry to tell you, but you do appear to be rather obnoxious right now, though whether there is any intent behind it, I am unable to tell.
I appreciate your honesty and straightforwardness (~~here and in your other reply to the user below~~ - sorry, I confused you with another user), but compared to the levels of vitriol being thrown at me in this thread for having the audacity to not just assume that a woman is a horrible bigot deserving of a bafflingly rude customer service interaction simply for asking for a "boy toy" for her son, I'd say I'm doing pretty well here, all things considered.
I'm just not sure how I'm the obnoxious one in this scenario, instead of all of the inflammatory commenters and the really obvious fishing attempts for bigotry that are keeping this sub-thread going?
Am I the obnoxious one just because I'm the one choosing not to go along with the ridiculous circle-jerk, even though my comments are an order of magnitude less antagonistic than the ones I'm responding to? I legitimately don't know.
~~You're~~ the other user is right, though - my mind's not going to change, and the handful of upvotes I'm getting lets me know that others feel the same way, even if they're understandably hesitant to speak up about it with all the personal attacks I'm getting here as a result.
LOL, I don't know what the numbers were when you wrote that, but "appeal to upvotes" as an argument is hilariously bad for someone who's being ratioed as heavily as you are.
It's weird to conclude the story takes place during a recession.
We don't have time for an interview through the McDonald's drive-thru, my friend; you're clogging up the line.