this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
277 points (99.3% liked)

World News

48840 readers
1828 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The party of El Salvador President Nayib Bukele approved constitutional changes in the country's National Assembly on Thursday that will allow indefinite presidential reelection and extend presidential terms to six years.

Lawmaker Ana Figueroa from the New Ideas party had proposed the changes to five articles of the constitution. The proposal also included eliminating the second round of the election where the two top vote-getters from the first round face off.

New Ideas and its allies in the National Assembly quickly approved the proposals with the supermajority they hold. The vote passed with 57 in favor and three opposed.

Bukele overwhelmingly won reelection last year despite a constitutional ban, after Supreme Court justices selected by his party ruled in 2021 that it allowed reelection to a second five-year term.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

He treated the situation as a civil war rather than a criminal matter. What do you do in war? You go after all enemy combatants, you don't try to determine if one specific soldier killed any of yours. Anyone in enemy uniform is a legitimate target unless they surrender.

El Salvador gangs do have specific ways of visually distinguishing themselves even if those are not traditional uniforms. Of course there are people wearing the same clothes and tattoos just because they think it's cool, but that is unfortunately a darwin award case.

In this context the captured are not in prison but in a POW camp. What he's missing is an exit strategy. Eventually you have to establish a permanent peace and release the POWs under some conditions. Not to mention obey the Geneva Convention which enumerates some rights. That's why he's always framing it as being tough on criminals.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

This completely omits the other part of his strategy which is paying bribes to gangs to chill out and giving cushy treatment to participating members who happen to be incarcerated. Since they typically fight over money (directly and indirectly) this seems to have quieted things but I can't see this lasting forever. People will get greedy and break the peace eventually.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 22 points 1 day ago

Eventually you have to establish a permanent peace and release the POWs under some conditions

Not when you're totalitarian dictator

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course there are people wearing the same clothes and tattoos just because they think it's cool, but that is unfortunately a darwin award case.

Yeah fuck them for wearing colors they liked.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I get where you're coming from but if you were to fly to Ukraine today, put on a Russian uniform, and walk around you'd have a bad time.

But this is only applying to those that continued to wear these things after their government declared a war on it's own citizens.