this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
73 points (97.4% liked)

PC Gaming

11916 readers
281 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"We developed RE engine, we can't not use it even though it absolutely sucks and apparently cannot be fixed on PC!"

[–] addie@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Resident Evil Village uses that, doesn't it? If you obtain a, ahem, Denuvo-free version, it's absolutely buttery smooth. Makes a great job of interiors, exteriors, character animation, and particle effects - especially smoke and fire. It just stutters like fuck to the point of unplayability if you try and run the version that you'd get through Steam.

[–] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

My guess here is that it isn't Denuvo, it just seems like it's not designed for Open World games. These issues all also exist on console, where Denuvo isn't a problem (although it certainly isn't helping either). Dragon's Dogma 2 exhibited a lot of the same poor performance and stuttering nearly a year before MH Wilds came out.

By then, I assume the game was too far into development to change course, with it's ambitious design and a lot of AI that has to always run in each area adding to the engine issues.

Honestly.... I'm not sure how much better they can make it, given how much time they've had to work on it, and that DD2 never really escaped its issues too. It feels like RE Engine was just... fundamentally not designed for this, no matter how great an engine it is in its niche.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is RE engine considered bad? Other than this game, every other RE Engine game worked great for me.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

RE is meant for pretty looking 1-2 mile stretches of area, static backgrounds and ~15-30 enemies at most.

You know, the kind of engine you'd use for Devil May Cry or Resident Evil.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Monster Hunter Rise was great! But that was a switch port, so you might be right when it comes to something that’s a bit more graphic intensive like MH Wilds and Dragons Dogma.

Dragon's Dogma 2 was also a bit of a disaster