this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
205 points (97.7% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

977 readers
4 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world

!antifascism@midwest.social

!politicus@kbin.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (8 children)

That’s what I do not understand. There is no correlation between dating 19 y/o and being a pedo, at least from the psychological point of view.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That sounds like something you just made up.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It is easy to assume, isn’t it? It was not possible for you to look up the terms:

  • Pedophilia,
  • Hebephilia,
  • Ephebophilia, and
  • Nepiophilia,

right? It is so so hard to actually look up some things before you form and opinion, right?

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, looking up terms does not give you insight into correlation or lack thereof. Who told you there’s no correlation?

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s the very reason you classify and name it differently, because there is no obvious and clear correlation. If all people who are into 16 y/o would also be into 2 y/o, there would only be one term describing the condition.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Different classifications can have strong correlation. Casual observation isn’t going to cut it here. Unless you’re a professional in this area or are well read on relevant studies, I reiterate my previous comment that you’re just inventing the level of correlation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)