this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
132 points (99.3% liked)
Privacy
2065 readers
42 users here now
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What about Steam, Amazon, ....?
Those services can either be blocked outright or use the parental controls provided by those services. None of this justifies big brother style government over reach. Additionally to me, the kids you need to protect are the really young ones. Teens ideally shouldn't be browsing adult content but it's far less damaging to them than young kids. And young kids don't need steam or unrestricted Netflix etc. They're also far less skilled at bypassing this stuff.
So, parental controls now how much exactly if the person using it is the patent?
And again, you didn't read anything about the EUID project. I know this because the data protection rules for the EUID are fucking insane. The reason why the project in question (age verification) exists, so user can verify their age WITHOUT providing any details about who they are to online services
It is unbelievable, no glue about what this piece of software is who wrote it, for what, what are the legal grounds, but spitting bullshit, yes nice!
I will write a more detailed post about the whole issue, where things must be changed, how, and the impact and false assumptions.
But I will end this conversation here, because it just makes no sense. You lack the knowledge to provide anything useful to such a discussion