this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)
In My Mind
528 readers
2 users here now
This community serves as a platform for me to share my discoveries and interests. It's a blend of self-expression and a commitment to delivering quality content, curated with the intention of providing valuable knowledge. Helping find valuable pockets of knowledge on the internet for you.
I hope this can serve as a valuable source of infortmation for you.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ummm, no. This is a fundamental misrepresentation of what "survival of the fittest" actually means, from a biological standpoint.
If a creature survives long enough to reproduce, then obviously it passes its generic material on to the next generation. There is no debate on this. It is a biological fact, that your offspring inherit your genetic legacy.
This is how "natural selection" works. If you are fortunate enough to have offspring, your genetic heritage survives along with your offspring. That's the only way you can pass on your individual genetic profile.
If you do not survive long enough to reproduce, your genetic heritage dies with you. This means that every living creature on this planet, had ancestors that were successful enough to reproduce. Not one creature alive today, is the descendant of an organism that was unsuccessful in this manner.
The "fittest", survived.