64
Canada’s hockey case raised questions about toxic culture – so why did the accuser end up on trial?
(www.theguardian.com)
What's going on Canada?
🍁 Meta
🗺️ Provinces / Territories
🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
🏒 Sports
Hockey
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
💻 Schools / Universities
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
🗣️ Politics
🍁 Social / Culture
Rules
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
Because you can't prove what's inside your mind, and that's what a lot of sexual assault cases come down to.
She said and acted one way, but is saying after the fact that in her head she believed something else.
You can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt in that case.
There is video of her "consenting" but you could hear the men in the background telling her "say it, say it". A woman in a room of at least 5 large men intimidating her to consent is not consent, that is coercion. And that is not in her head, that is video evidence.
The problem with your statement is here:
'a woman in a room of at least 5 large men intimidating her to consent is not consent"
You assume it isn't, but it 100% can be. Your bias doesn't make you right.
There are plenty of completely consensual videos of this exact situation online if you'd like to check. Both professional and amateur.