this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2025
431 points (97.6% liked)

Not The Onion

17464 readers
1041 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 days ago (4 children)

but that argument would never persuade anyone, it's just intellectual autofellatio for people who are already on that side of the debate.

if your belief system incorporates souls or spirits, then the fact that they can't be measured surely is even more proof for them existing outside the "real world". just like how someone who believes in reincarnation wouldn't believe that your good and bad deeds are somehow tallied chemically within your body, but kept track of in some incorporeal way, to be used after you've left the mortal coil.

all of these systems are based on coincidence and things that are inherently unknowable, like prayer or what happens to your conscience when you die. trying to logic someone out of a belief system isn't worth the effort or even an interesting endeavour.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It didn't seem at all like an argument to me or an attempt by the OP to persuade anyone of anything. I read it as a description of their thought process as to how they arrived at the conclusions they did in their own life.

While some might find that enlightening if open to it or threatening if they disagree, it didn't strike me as an attempt to talk me into their (non)religion.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i've never seen someone write like that just for sharing.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

I call it geeking out which is usually instead about anime plots or TTRPG characters and worlds. And it's a habit of us neurospicy folk that often scares those who aren't.

My whole point was that while Trump's memo was meant to enable Christian proselytizers, there is a whole demographic of thinkers (mad, free or otherwise) who will also be enabled, so this may well be a Chesterton's Fence issue, especially if those thinkers are the office clerks who are super good at data crunching and making sure the LAN doesn't fall apart.

load more comments (1 replies)