Fediverse vs Disinformation
Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.
Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.
What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.
By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.
Community rules
Same as instance rules, plus:
- No disinformation
- Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation
Related websites
- EU vs Disinfo
- FactCheck.org
- PolitiFact
- Snopes
- Media Bias / Fact Check
- PEN America
- Media Matters
- FAIR
Matrix chat links
view the rest of the comments
WSJ is just rich people propaganda.
Same as Economist and Financial Times
Actually, forbes is so bad I want to mention this article: https://www.forbes.com/sites/prakashdolsak/2023/05/01/why-blowing-up-pipelines-will-not-solve-the-climate-crisis/?ctpv=searchpage
It's clearly written by a guy who didn't read the book.
One of the first points made is that the public doesn't support disruption. No shit, I don't think people supported the suffragettes' disruption, but that got women their rights.
Won't someone please think of the poor shareholders!
One problem with this, the shareholders make money from harmful actions, and actively encourage them.
These points show nothing except that the writer didn't read the book. The XR train protest was severly critised by the author, and the author addresses poorer people who depend on fossil fuels.
This is all very fitting, because the author of the book calls forbes a billionaire rag in the book.
And forbes.
Listening to the FT's podcast Swamp Notes was infuriating. I get who your audience is, but if you're going to have the guy from the center right think tank on and the establishment technocratic reporter talking with him, at least have some progressive on to defend his views.
The worst part is how they infantalize him and his views.
Even more sad, its more of an apsirationally, i see myself as a rich business person, oriented propoganda.
Its for wannabes and the low to mid level management crowd, small business owners who like to pretend they understand economics beyond 'underpay my workers'.
WSJ readers are basically the people who watch SqwuakBox and Jim Cramer...
Actually clever rich people may read the WSJ from time to time, but they're gonna be spending more time reading esoteric industry specific journals, following the actual appearances and conferences of the people who the WSJ writes about, to make actual investment and business strategies with.
Reminds me of this, though:
Education is Ignorance Noam Chomsky Excerpted from Class Warfare, 1995, pp. 19-23, 27-31
https://chomsky.info/warfare02/
WSJ changed a lot since then?
So for starters, I agree with Chomsky broadly here, he isn't wrong that... its good to keep up on what a class or segment of people read if you want to know how their brains work, how they think, what they often do not even realize they hold as unchallengeable beliefs... and that when you're in a cultural (?) space for corpos, you get to see what they're actually worried about, vs what they project outward to a more general, mass audience.
To specifically answer your question:
No, it hasn't changed that much.
WSJ, FT, The Economist...
yeah, they're all generally in that same boat, I am just telling you as a former corpo, former executive level data analyst, that most of what is in those is basically just the bougie version of a gossip rag, lifestyle pieces.
A bougie lifestyle piece just is the latest 'enlightened' perspective to have on monetary nterest rate policy or whatever.
Its like Patrick Bateman.
Most of them don't really care, beyond perfecting the brand that is their own corporate persona.
The people that actually know what they are talking about may yes, read these occasionally, semi-regularly, just to generally keep abreast of things, but the really powerful data and announcements are in industry journals, and most of the time, the really important conversations and missives are not publicly available.
If you have access to or know how to read those, you have a 90% chancd of knowing what the FT, WSJ, and Economist are going to be talking about in 6 weeks to 6 months.
That's very interesting, thanks