this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
19 points (91.3% liked)
Bicycles
4347 readers
2 users here now
Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca
A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!
Community Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
-
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn.
-
No ads / spamming.
-
Ride bikes
Other cycling-related communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah it's weird they didn't mark the mm size to match, e.g. 35-451.
That's not a tire sizing
Yes it is. ETRTO size
What is it if not tire size?
Not sure, but every bike tire I have seen it doesn't correlate to the size.
Interesting. In my anecdata they match within a couple of mm. I have two bikes with Panaracer currently, one has Pasela PT, the other one is Gravel King, both 38-622. One measures 37.5mm, the other 36mm. That said I've only ridden relatively narrow tires over the last decade 25-40mm so it's possible that the accuracy is higher in that range.
In any case X-Y with numbers like this really look like an ETRTO marking which according to the few tire manufacturers I've checked is how they size tires. Along with the traditional inch size conversion.
Even CST themselves correlate inch size to ETRTO size within 1-2mm.