this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2025
137 points (99.3% liked)

Politics

848 readers
11 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

Rule 7. No conjecture type posts (this could, might, may, etc.). Only factual. If the headline is wrong, clarify within the body. More info

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Justice Department this week dropped an antitrust case against a company represented by the lobbying firm that employed Pam Bondi before her confirmation as attorney general earlier this year.

American Express Global Business Travel (Amex GBT) has paid the lobbying giant Ballard Partners hundreds of thousands of dollars this year to pressure Bondi's Justice Department on "antitrust issues," according to federal disclosures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shrugs@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Corporations should not be allowed to lobby. With all that money and concentrated effort capitalism can produce, the people will always lose.

I will never understand why people believe corporate influence on the government is so fucking important. It will come naturally, through the people not by lobbyist if you deny their influence

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I didn't say it was important, I said lobbying is protected.

Of course corporation should be able to lobby! A corporation, in theory (heh), is a group of people with a common financial cause. That notion is not inherently evil.

Were I a legislator I'd happily allow lobbyists in my office. Who am I to know everything? I'd listen carefully and kick their ass out if I disagreed morally. But then I don't get campaign funds to continue fighting the good fight! What a trap.

Lobbyists aren't the problem, Citizens United v. FEC is the fucking problem. As to Congress reigning in lobbyist favors and money, fat chance.

Read Obama's two books? Forgot which one it was where he was talking about funding his run for Illinois State Senator vs. what Axlerod told him he's need to run for US Senator. Don't remember the numbers but Obama was fucking shocked! So was I!

tl;dr: Lobbyists aren't so much an issue as campaign finance reform. But the good guys can't reform it without losing the money to stay in office, not overnight. LOL, 10th grade government teacher covered this. Local guy dropped out the mayor's race because he couldn't, in good conscience, kiss all the asses he needed to appease to raise campaign funds. What a world.

[–] shrugs@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Of course corporations should not be able to lobby!

See, we can't outcompete corporate money and dedication. We will always lose, when profit is more important than say global warming or clean water or affordable / free healthcare.

Capitalism is way better then any other system to create and improve what gets the most profit and it's by definition without morale.

It should not be allowed to do that with lobbing against the well-being of the people. It only exists because of us.

What I'm trying to say is: that protection is bullshit

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

should not be allowed to do that with lobbing against the well-being of the people

You surely see problems with "well-being" defined in law?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

(can't edit my posts and that one needs SERIOUS work, poor and conflicting arguments, fuck it, stands)

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Agreed fully. It never fails to have people materialize who will say that rights that should be given to you but rarely are instead allows for legal fictions to have untold sway over policy.